Audiobookshelfvsrpi-mqtt-monitor
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Audiobookshelf | rpi-mqtt-monitor | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 15 in Audiobook Management | #58 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 14 839 | 328 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +402 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 | 8 |
| Latest release | v2.37.2 · 23 Oct 2026 | 1.4.3 · 18 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Audiobookshelf scores 79/100 against 51/100 for rpi-mqtt-monitor, so it is the safer default.
Audiobookshelf ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for rpi-mqtt-monitor.
If you want the quickest setup, Audiobookshelf is easier to run; rpi-mqtt-monitor needs more configuration.
Audiobookshelf is growing faster right now (+402 stars in 30 days).
Audiobookshelf details →rpi-mqtt-monitor details →
Swap a project
Keep Audiobookshelf, compare it with
Keep rpi-mqtt-monitor, compare it with