Audiobookshelfvspandaprobe
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Audiobookshelf | pandaprobe | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 15 in Audiobook Management | #44 of 125 in AI |
| GitHub stars | 14 839 | 792 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +402 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 | 16 |
| Latest release | v2.37.2 · 23 Oct 2026 | v0.7.0 · 4 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Audiobookshelf scores 79/100 against 51/100 for pandaprobe, so it is the safer default.
pandaprobe ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 14 for Audiobookshelf.
If you want the quickest setup, Audiobookshelf is easier to run; pandaprobe needs more configuration.
Audiobookshelf is growing faster right now (+402 stars in 30 days).
Audiobookshelf details →pandaprobe details →
Swap a project
Keep Audiobookshelf, compare it with
Keep pandaprobe, compare it with