Audiobookshelfvshass-configurator
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Audiobookshelf | hass-configurator | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 | 50/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 15 in Audiobook Management | #6 of 8 in Configuration Management |
| GitHub stars | 14 848 | 339 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +411 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 | 2 |
| Latest release | v2.37.2 · 23 Oct 2026 | 0.7.0 · 18 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Audiobookshelf scores 79/100 against 50/100 for hass-configurator, so it is the safer default.
Audiobookshelf ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for hass-configurator.
If you want the quickest setup, Audiobookshelf is easier to run; hass-configurator needs more configuration.
Audiobookshelf is growing faster right now (+411 stars in 30 days).
Audiobookshelf details →hass-configurator details →
Swap a project
Keep Audiobookshelf, compare it with
Keep hass-configurator, compare it with