AtoMvsspacedrive
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| AtoM | spacedrive | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 56/100 | 70/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 12 in Archiving & Preservation | #4 of 34 in File Management |
| GitHub stars | 304 | 39 329 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +307 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 0 |
| Latest release | v2.7.3-hotfix.1 · 26 Aug 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | PHP | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
spacedrive scores 70/100 against 56/100 for AtoM, so it is the safer default.
AtoM ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for spacedrive.
If you want the quickest setup, spacedrive is easier to run; AtoM needs more configuration.
spacedrive is growing faster right now (+307 stars in 30 days).
AtoM details →spacedrive details →
Swap a project
Keep AtoM, compare it with
Keep spacedrive, compare it with