AstrBotvsQtap
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| AstrBot | Qtap | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 88/100 | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 124 in AI | #21 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 44 617 | 1 465 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 638 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 22 | 0 |
| Latest release | v4.29.3 · 24 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | C |
Which one should you pick?
AstrBot scores 88/100 against 51/100 for Qtap, so it is the safer default.
AstrBot ships more often: 22 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Qtap.
If you want the quickest setup, AstrBot is easier to run; Qtap needs more configuration.
AstrBot is growing faster right now (+3 638 stars in 30 days).
AstrBot details →Qtap details →
Swap a project
Keep AstrBot, compare it with
Keep Qtap, compare it with