Argo CDvsZero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Argo CD | Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 28 in CI/CD | #4 of 11 in Container Orchestration |
| GitHub stars | 24 497 | 1 725 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +272 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 30 | 9 |
| Latest release | v3.3.18 · 22 Oct 2026 | 4.4.4 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Go | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Argo CD scores 81/100 against 64/100 for Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes, so it is the safer default.
Argo CD ships more often: 30 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes.
If you want the quickest setup, Argo CD is easier to run; Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes needs more configuration.
Argo CD is growing faster right now (+272 stars in 30 days).
Argo CD details →Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes details →