Argo CDvsRustFS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Argo CD | RustFS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 | 74/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 28 in CI/CD | #1 of 5 in Storage |
| GitHub stars | 24 498 | 35 503 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +273 | +1 771 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 30 | 5 |
| Latest release | v3.3.18 · 22 Oct 2026 | 1.0.4 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
Argo CD scores 81/100 against 74/100 for RustFS, so it is the safer default.
Argo CD ships more often: 30 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for RustFS.
If you want the quickest setup, Argo CD is easier to run; RustFS needs more configuration.
RustFS is growing faster right now (+1 771 stars in 30 days).
Argo CD details →RustFS details →