Argo CDvsHiClaw
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Argo CD | HiClaw | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 | 67/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 28 in CI/CD | #32 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 24 495 | 5 885 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +270 | +222 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 30 | 15 |
| Latest release | v3.3.18 · 22 Oct 2026 | v1.2.5 · 16 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Argo CD scores 81/100 against 67/100 for HiClaw, so it is the safer default.
Argo CD ships more often: 30 stable releases in the past year, against 15 for HiClaw.
If you want the quickest setup, HiClaw is easier to run; Argo CD needs more configuration.
Argo CD details →HiClaw details →