ArgillavsZero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Argilla | Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 3 in Data Collection | #4 of 11 in Container Orchestration |
| GitHub stars | 5 185 | 1 725 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +64 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 9 |
| Latest release | — | 4.4.4 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Argilla and Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes score the same (64/100), so the choice comes down to the details below.
Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Argilla.
If you want the quickest setup, Argilla is easier to run; Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes needs more configuration.
Argilla is growing faster right now (+64 stars in 30 days).
Argilla details →Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes details →
Swap a project
Keep Argilla, compare it with
Keep Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes, compare it with