ArgillavsStandard Notes
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Argilla | Standard Notes | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 | 70/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 3 in Data Collection | #8 of 81 in Notes & Editors |
| GitHub stars | 5 185 | 6 685 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +64 | +53 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 5 |
| Latest release | — | @standardnotes/mobile@3.202.11 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Standard Notes scores 70/100 against 64/100 for Argilla, so it is the safer default.
Standard Notes ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Argilla.
If you want the quickest setup, Argilla is easier to run; Standard Notes needs more configuration.
Argilla details →Standard Notes details →
Swap a project
Keep Argilla, compare it with
Keep Standard Notes, compare it with