open-wearablesvsStandard Notes
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| open-wearables | Standard Notes | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 70/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 31 in Health & Fitness | #8 of 81 in Notes & Editors |
| GitHub stars | 2 728 | 6 685 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +173 | +53 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 5 |
| Latest release | 0.10.0 · 16 Oct 2026 | @standardnotes/mobile@3.202.11 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Standard Notes scores 70/100 against 63/100 for open-wearables, so it is the safer default.
open-wearables ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for Standard Notes.
If you want the quickest setup, open-wearables is easier to run; Standard Notes needs more configuration.
open-wearables is growing faster right now (+173 stars in 30 days).
open-wearables details →Standard Notes details →
Swap a project
Keep open-wearables, compare it with
Keep Standard Notes, compare it with