ArgillavsRequest Tracker
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Argilla | Request Tracker | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 | 65/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 3 in Data Collection | #3 of 9 in Helpdesk |
| GitHub stars | 5 186 | 1 164 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +64 | +5 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 2 |
| Latest release | — | rt-5.0.10 · 1 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Perl |
Which one should you pick?
Request Tracker scores 65/100 against 64/100 for Argilla, so it is the safer default.
Request Tracker ships more often: 2 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Argilla.
If you want the quickest setup, Argilla is easier to run; Request Tracker needs more configuration.
Argilla is growing faster right now (+64 stars in 30 days).
Argilla details →Request Tracker details →
Swap a project
Keep Argilla, compare it with
Keep Request Tracker, compare it with