open-wearablesvsRequest Tracker
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| open-wearables | Request Tracker | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 65/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 31 in Health & Fitness | #3 of 9 in Helpdesk |
| GitHub stars | 2 730 | 1 164 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +168 | +5 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 2 |
| Latest release | 0.10.0 · 16 Oct 2026 | rt-5.0.10 · 1 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Perl |
Which one should you pick?
Request Tracker scores 65/100 against 63/100 for open-wearables, so it is the safer default.
open-wearables ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Request Tracker.
If you want the quickest setup, open-wearables is easier to run; Request Tracker needs more configuration.
open-wearables is growing faster right now (+168 stars in 30 days).
open-wearables details →Request Tracker details →
Swap a project
Keep open-wearables, compare it with
Keep Request Tracker, compare it with