ArgillavsQinglong
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Argilla | Qinglong | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 3 in Data Collection | #3 of 34 in Task Management |
| GitHub stars | 5 185 | 20 020 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +64 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 2 |
| Latest release | — | upgrade-master · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
Qinglong scores 69/100 against 64/100 for Argilla, so it is the safer default.
Qinglong ships more often: 2 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Argilla.
If you want the quickest setup, Qinglong is easier to run; Argilla needs more configuration.
Argilla is growing faster right now (+64 stars in 30 days).
Argilla details →Qinglong details →
Swap a project
Keep Argilla, compare it with
Keep Qinglong, compare it with