open-wearablesvsQinglong
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| open-wearables | Qinglong | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 31 in Health & Fitness | #3 of 34 in Task Management |
| GitHub stars | 2 728 | 20 023 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +166 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 2 |
| Latest release | 0.10.0 · 16 Oct 2026 | upgrade-master · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
Qinglong scores 69/100 against 63/100 for open-wearables, so it is the safer default.
open-wearables ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Qinglong.
If you want the quickest setup, Qinglong is easier to run; open-wearables needs more configuration.
open-wearables is growing faster right now (+166 stars in 30 days).
open-wearables details →Qinglong details →
Swap a project
Keep open-wearables, compare it with
Keep Qinglong, compare it with