ArchivesSpacevsNodeBB
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ArchivesSpace | NodeBB | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 58/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 12 in Archiving & Preservation | #4 of 69 in Social Networks & Forums |
| GitHub stars | 447 | 15 243 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +8 | +18 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 31 |
| Latest release | v4.2.1 · 29 Jun 2026 | v4.16.5 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Ruby | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
NodeBB scores 73/100 against 58/100 for ArchivesSpace, so it is the safer default.
NodeBB ships more often: 31 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for ArchivesSpace.
If you want the quickest setup, NodeBB is easier to run; ArchivesSpace needs more configuration.
NodeBB is growing faster right now (+18 stars in 30 days).
ArchivesSpace details →NodeBB details →
Swap a project
Keep ArchivesSpace, compare it with
Keep NodeBB, compare it with