Archivematicavsspacedrive
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Archivematica | spacedrive | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 57/100 | 70/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 12 in Archiving & Preservation | #4 of 34 in File Management |
| GitHub stars | 522 | 39 333 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +311 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
spacedrive scores 70/100 against 57/100 for Archivematica, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, spacedrive is easier to run; Archivematica needs more configuration.
spacedrive is growing faster right now (+311 stars in 30 days).
Archivematica details →spacedrive details →
Swap a project
Keep Archivematica, compare it with
Keep spacedrive, compare it with