ArchiveBoxvsMastodon
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ArchiveBox | Mastodon | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 | 82/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Archiving & Preservation | #2 of 69 in Social Networks & Forums |
| GitHub stars | 28 898 | 50 457 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +309 | +137 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 38 |
| Latest release | v0.9.77 · 27 Oct 2026 | v4.4.26 · 1 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Ruby |
Which one should you pick?
Mastodon scores 82/100 against 79/100 for ArchiveBox, so it is the safer default.
Mastodon ships more often: 38 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for ArchiveBox.
If you want the quickest setup, ArchiveBox is easier to run; Mastodon needs more configuration.
ArchiveBox is growing faster right now (+309 stars in 30 days).
ArchiveBox details →Mastodon details →
Swap a project
Keep ArchiveBox, compare it with
Keep Mastodon, compare it with