ArchiveBoxvskoodo-reader
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ArchiveBox | koodo-reader | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 | 78/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Archiving & Preservation | #1 of 7 in E-book Management |
| GitHub stars | 28 897 | 28 662 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +308 | +370 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 19 |
| Latest release | v0.9.77 · 27 Oct 2026 | v2.4.6 · 7 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
ArchiveBox scores 79/100 against 78/100 for koodo-reader, so it is the safer default.
koodo-reader ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for ArchiveBox.
If you want the quickest setup, ArchiveBox is easier to run; koodo-reader needs more configuration.
ArchiveBox details →koodo-reader details →
Swap a project
Keep ArchiveBox, compare it with
Keep koodo-reader, compare it with