ArchiveBoxvsFedora Repository
Two self-hosted Archiving & Preservation projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ArchiveBox | Fedora Repository | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 | 53/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Archiving & Preservation | #7 of 12 in Archiving & Preservation |
| GitHub stars | 28 895 | 253 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +315 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 2 |
| Latest release | v0.9.77 · 27 Oct 2026 | fcrepo-6.5.2 · 16 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Java |
Which one should you pick?
ArchiveBox scores 79/100 against 53/100 for Fedora Repository, so it is the safer default.
ArchiveBox ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Fedora Repository.
If you want the quickest setup, ArchiveBox is easier to run; Fedora Repository needs more configuration.
ArchiveBox is growing faster right now (+315 stars in 30 days).
ArchiveBox details →Fedora Repository details →All Archiving & Preservation projects →
Swap a project
Keep ArchiveBox, compare it with
Keep Fedora Repository, compare it with