Arcanevstemporal
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Arcane | temporal | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 83/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 44 in Container Management | #1 of 1 in Workflow |
| GitHub stars | 8 102 | 24 044 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +533 | +784 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 31 | 11 |
| Latest release | v2.17.1 · 25 Oct 2026 | v1.30.8 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Go |
Which one should you pick?
temporal scores 83/100 against 76/100 for Arcane, so it is the safer default.
Arcane ships more often: 31 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for temporal.
If you want the quickest setup, Arcane is easier to run; temporal needs more configuration.
Arcane details →temporal details →
Swap a project
Keep Arcane, compare it with
Keep temporal, compare it with