AppsmithvsZammad
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Appsmith | Zammad | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 70/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 3 in Internal Tools | #1 of 9 in Helpdesk |
| GitHub stars | 41 134 | 6 050 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +203 | +103 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 0 |
| Latest release | v2.6.0 · 28 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Ruby |
Which one should you pick?
Appsmith scores 80/100 against 70/100 for Zammad, so it is the safer default.
Appsmith ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Zammad.
If you want the quickest setup, Appsmith is easier to run; Zammad needs more configuration.
Appsmith details →Zammad details →
Swap a project
Keep Appsmith, compare it with
Keep Zammad, compare it with