AppsmithvsLubeLogger
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Appsmith | LubeLogger | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 65/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 3 in Internal Tools | #2 of 5 in Vehicle Management |
| GitHub stars | 41 134 | 2 926 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +203 | +70 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 17 |
| Latest release | v2.6.0 · 28 Oct 2026 | v1.7.4 · 14 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
Appsmith scores 80/100 against 65/100 for LubeLogger, so it is the safer default.
Appsmith ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 17 for LubeLogger.
If you want the quickest setup, LubeLogger is easier to run; Appsmith needs more configuration.
Appsmith is growing faster right now (+203 stars in 30 days).
Appsmith details →LubeLogger details →
Swap a project
Keep Appsmith, compare it with
Keep LubeLogger, compare it with