AppsmithvsKokoro FastAPI
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Appsmith | Kokoro FastAPI | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 3 in Internal Tools | #4 of 9 in Text to Speech |
| GitHub stars | 41 135 | 5 607 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +204 | +132 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 14 |
| Latest release | v2.6.0 · 28 Oct 2026 | v0.9.1 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Appsmith scores 80/100 against 69/100 for Kokoro FastAPI, so it is the safer default.
Appsmith ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 14 for Kokoro FastAPI.
If you want the quickest setup, Kokoro FastAPI is easier to run; Appsmith needs more configuration.
Appsmith details →Kokoro FastAPI details →
Swap a project
Keep Appsmith, compare it with
Keep Kokoro FastAPI, compare it with