apitablevsWorkout.cool
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| apitable | Workout.cool | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 17 in Low Code | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker |
| GitHub stars | 15 653 | 8 651 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +36 | +156 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 1 |
| Latest release | — | v1.3.2 · 7 Dec 2025 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Workout.cool scores 66/100 against 65/100 for apitable, so it is the safer default.
Workout.cool ships more often: 1 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for apitable.
If you want the quickest setup, Workout.cool is easier to run; apitable needs more configuration.
Workout.cool is growing faster right now (+156 stars in 30 days).
apitable details →Workout.cool details →