apitablevsTryton
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| apitable | Tryton | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 | 68/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 17 in Low Code | #3 of 14 in ERP |
| GitHub stars | 15 653 | — |
| Stars, last 30 days | +36 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | — |
Which one should you pick?
Tryton scores 68/100 against 65/100 for apitable, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, apitable is easier to run; Tryton needs more configuration.
apitable is growing faster right now (+36 stars in 30 days).
apitable details →Tryton details →