apitablevsStandard Notes
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| apitable | Standard Notes | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 | 70/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 17 in Low Code | #8 of 81 in Notes & Editors |
| GitHub stars | 15 653 | 6 685 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +36 | +53 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 5 |
| Latest release | — | @standardnotes/mobile@3.202.11 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Standard Notes scores 70/100 against 65/100 for apitable, so it is the safer default.
Standard Notes ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for apitable.
If you want the quickest setup, apitable is easier to run; Standard Notes needs more configuration.
apitable details →Standard Notes details →