apitablevsRainbond
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| apitable | Rainbond | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 17 in Low Code | #2 of 10 in PaaS |
| GitHub stars | 15 654 | 6 284 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +35 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 10 |
| Latest release | — | v6.10.0-release · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |
Which one should you pick?
apitable scores 65/100 against 64/100 for Rainbond, so it is the safer default.
Rainbond ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for apitable.
apitable is growing faster right now (+35 stars in 30 days).
apitable details →Rainbond details →