apitablevsPortainer
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| apitable | Portainer | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 | 77/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 17 in Low Code | #1 of 44 in Container Management |
| GitHub stars | 15 653 | 38 737 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +36 | +188 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 21 |
| Latest release | — | 2.45.3 · 21 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Zlib |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Portainer scores 77/100 against 65/100 for apitable, so it is the safer default.
Portainer ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for apitable.
If you want the quickest setup, Portainer is easier to run; apitable needs more configuration.
Portainer is growing faster right now (+188 stars in 30 days).
apitable details →Portainer details →