apitablevsPimcore
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| apitable | Pimcore | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 17 in Low Code | #6 of 18 in Content Management |
| GitHub stars | 15 654 | 3 883 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +35 | +28 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 35 |
| Latest release | — | v2026.3.3.1 · 22 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | PHP |
Which one should you pick?
apitable scores 65/100 against 61/100 for Pimcore, so it is the safer default.
Pimcore ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for apitable.
If you want the quickest setup, apitable is easier to run; Pimcore needs more configuration.
apitable details →Pimcore details →