apitablevspenpot
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| apitable | penpot | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 | 84/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 17 in Low Code | #1 of 30 in Collaboration |
| GitHub stars | 15 654 | 61 805 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +37 | +1 493 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 12 |
| Latest release | — | 2.18.5 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Clojure |
Which one should you pick?
penpot scores 84/100 against 65/100 for apitable, so it is the safer default.
penpot ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for apitable.
If you want the quickest setup, apitable is easier to run; penpot needs more configuration.
penpot is growing faster right now (+1 493 stars in 30 days).
apitable details →penpot details →