apitablevsopenstatus
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| apitable | openstatus | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 17 in Low Code | #1 of 7 in Status Pages |
| GitHub stars | 15 653 | 9 239 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +36 | +96 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
openstatus scores 69/100 against 65/100 for apitable, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, apitable is easier to run; openstatus needs more configuration.
openstatus is growing faster right now (+96 stars in 30 days).
apitable details →openstatus details →