Apache Kafkavsmetamcp
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Apache Kafka | metamcp | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Message Broker | #10 of 39 in API Gateway |
| GitHub stars | 34 152 | 2 734 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +346 | +48 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 3 |
| Latest release | — | v2.4.22 · 19 Dec 2025 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Java | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Apache Kafka scores 83/100 against 61/100 for metamcp, so it is the safer default.
metamcp ships more often: 3 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Apache Kafka.
If you want the quickest setup, metamcp is easier to run; Apache Kafka needs more configuration.
Apache Kafka is growing faster right now (+346 stars in 30 days).
Apache Kafka details →metamcp details →