Apache Kafkavslangflow
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Apache Kafka | langflow | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 | 90/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Message Broker | #2 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 34 152 | 156 112 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +346 | +921 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 20 |
| Latest release | — | v1.12.8 · 21 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Java | Python |
Which one should you pick?
langflow scores 90/100 against 83/100 for Apache Kafka, so it is the safer default.
langflow ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Apache Kafka.
If you want the quickest setup, langflow is easier to run; Apache Kafka needs more configuration.
langflow is growing faster right now (+921 stars in 30 days).
Apache Kafka details →langflow details →