Apache HTTP ServervsUmlautAdaptarr
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Apache HTTP Server | UmlautAdaptarr | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 40/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 12 in Web Servers | #120 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | — | 309 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 3 |
| Latest release | — | v0.7.6 · 5 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | — |
| Main language | — | C |
Which one should you pick?
Apache HTTP Server scores 74/100 against 40/100 for UmlautAdaptarr, so it is the safer default.
UmlautAdaptarr ships more often: 3 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Apache HTTP Server.
If you want the quickest setup, UmlautAdaptarr is easier to run; Apache HTTP Server needs more configuration.
Apache HTTP Server details →UmlautAdaptarr details →