Apache CassandravsUmlautAdaptarr
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Apache Cassandra | UmlautAdaptarr | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 40/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 38 in Databases | #120 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 10 127 | 309 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +25 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 3 |
| Latest release | — | v0.7.6 · 5 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | — |
| Main language | Java | C |
Which one should you pick?
Apache Cassandra scores 74/100 against 40/100 for UmlautAdaptarr, so it is the safer default.
UmlautAdaptarr ships more often: 3 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Apache Cassandra.
If you want the quickest setup, UmlautAdaptarr is easier to run; Apache Cassandra needs more configuration.
Apache Cassandra is growing faster right now (+25 stars in 30 days).
Apache Cassandra details →UmlautAdaptarr details →