Apache CassandravsPruneMate
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Apache Cassandra | PruneMate | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 46/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 38 in Databases | #5 of 5 in Docker Management |
| GitHub stars | 10 126 | 468 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +24 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 10 |
| Latest release | — | V1.3.3 · 15 Feb 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Java | HTML |
Which one should you pick?
Apache Cassandra scores 74/100 against 46/100 for PruneMate, so it is the safer default.
PruneMate ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Apache Cassandra.
If you want the quickest setup, PruneMate is easier to run; Apache Cassandra needs more configuration.
Apache Cassandra is growing faster right now (+24 stars in 30 days).
Apache Cassandra details →PruneMate details →