Apache Cassandravsopen·kritt
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Apache Cassandra | open·kritt | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 62/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 38 in Databases | #24 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 10 127 | 2 380 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +25 | +1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 5 |
| Latest release | — | v1.4.1 · 16 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Java | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
Apache Cassandra scores 74/100 against 62/100 for open·kritt, so it is the safer default.
open·kritt ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Apache Cassandra.
If you want the quickest setup, open·kritt is easier to run; Apache Cassandra needs more configuration.
Apache Cassandra is growing faster right now (+25 stars in 30 days).
Apache Cassandra details →open·kritt details →