Apache CassandravsLabTether
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Apache Cassandra | LabTether | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 38 in Databases | #8 of 19 in Infrastructure Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 10 126 | 233 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +24 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 5 |
| Latest release | — | v1.4.0 · 17 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Java | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Apache Cassandra scores 74/100 against 51/100 for LabTether, so it is the safer default.
LabTether ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Apache Cassandra.
If you want the quickest setup, LabTether is easier to run; Apache Cassandra needs more configuration.
Apache Cassandra is growing faster right now (+24 stars in 30 days).
Apache Cassandra details →LabTether details →