Apache CassandravsHealthchecks
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Apache Cassandra | Healthchecks | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 38 in Databases | #2 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 10 126 | 10 466 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +24 | +108 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 12 |
| Latest release | — | v5.0.3 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | BSD-3-Clause |
| Main language | Java | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Apache Cassandra scores 74/100 against 73/100 for Healthchecks, so it is the safer default.
Healthchecks ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Apache Cassandra.
If you want the quickest setup, Healthchecks is easier to run; Apache Cassandra needs more configuration.
Healthchecks is growing faster right now (+108 stars in 30 days).
Apache Cassandra details →Healthchecks details →