Apache AirflowvsWackoWiki
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Apache Airflow | WackoWiki | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 84/100 | 44/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #27 of 31 in Wikis |
| GitHub stars | 47 304 | 55 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +338 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 7 |
| Latest release | providers-ydb/2.6.1 · 13 Oct 2026 | 6.3.0 · 6 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | BSD-3-Clause |
| Main language | Python | PHP |
Which one should you pick?
Apache Airflow scores 84/100 against 44/100 for WackoWiki, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, WackoWiki is easier to run; Apache Airflow needs more configuration.
Apache Airflow is growing faster right now (+338 stars in 30 days).
Apache Airflow details →WackoWiki details →