Apache AirflowvsUmami
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Apache Airflow | Umami | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 84/100 | 85/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #1 of 21 in Web analytics |
| GitHub stars | 47 301 | 39 754 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +344 | +773 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 13 |
| Latest release | providers-ydb/2.6.1 · 13 Oct 2026 | v3.4.1 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Umami scores 85/100 against 84/100 for Apache Airflow, so it is the safer default.
Umami ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for Apache Airflow.
If you want the quickest setup, Umami is easier to run; Apache Airflow needs more configuration.
Umami is growing faster right now (+773 stars in 30 days).
Apache Airflow details →Umami details →