Apache AirflowvsSonarQube
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Apache Airflow | SonarQube | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 84/100 | 71/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #2 of 10 in Code Review |
| GitHub stars | 47 302 | 11 122 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +345 | +102 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 12 |
| Latest release | providers-ydb/2.6.1 · 13 Oct 2026 | 26.10.0.133078 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | LGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Java |
Which one should you pick?
Apache Airflow scores 84/100 against 71/100 for SonarQube, so it is the safer default.
SonarQube ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for Apache Airflow.
Apache Airflow is growing faster right now (+345 stars in 30 days).
Apache Airflow details →SonarQube details →