Apache AirflowvsSelf-Hosted Metrics (SHM)
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Apache Airflow | Self-Hosted Metrics (SHM) | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 84/100 | 45/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #77 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 47 307 | 165 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +341 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 9 |
| Latest release | providers-ydb/2.6.1 · 13 Oct 2026 | v1.2.7 · 29 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Apache Airflow scores 84/100 against 45/100 for Self-Hosted Metrics (SHM), so it is the safer default.
Self-Hosted Metrics (SHM) ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for Apache Airflow.
If you want the quickest setup, Self-Hosted Metrics (SHM) is easier to run; Apache Airflow needs more configuration.
Apache Airflow is growing faster right now (+341 stars in 30 days).
Apache Airflow details →Self-Hosted Metrics (SHM) details →