Apache Airflowvssandboxed.sh
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Apache Airflow | sandboxed.sh | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 84/100 | 50/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #97 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 47 302 | 672 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +345 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 9 |
| Latest release | providers-ydb/2.6.1 · 13 Oct 2026 | android-v1.21.1 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | — |
| Main language | Python | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
Apache Airflow scores 84/100 against 50/100 for sandboxed.sh, so it is the safer default.
sandboxed.sh ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for Apache Airflow.
Apache Airflow is growing faster right now (+345 stars in 30 days).
Apache Airflow details →sandboxed.sh details →