Apache AirflowvsQGIS Web Client
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Apache Airflow | QGIS Web Client | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 84/100 | 57/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #9 of 12 in Maps |
| GitHub stars | 47 308 | 383 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +342 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 10 |
| Latest release | providers-ydb/2.6.1 · 13 Oct 2026 | ci-latest-master · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | BSD-2-Clause |
| Main language | Python | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
Apache Airflow scores 84/100 against 57/100 for QGIS Web Client, so it is the safer default.
QGIS Web Client ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for Apache Airflow.
Apache Airflow is growing faster right now (+342 stars in 30 days).
Apache Airflow details →QGIS Web Client details →