Apache AirflowvsOpenScribe
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Apache Airflow | OpenScribe | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 84/100 | 44/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #4 of 5 in Healthcare |
| GitHub stars | 47 307 | 223 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +341 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 2 |
| Latest release | providers-ydb/2.6.1 · 13 Oct 2026 | v0.1.1 · 12 Mar 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Apache Airflow scores 84/100 against 44/100 for OpenScribe, so it is the safer default.
Apache Airflow ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for OpenScribe.
If you want the quickest setup, OpenScribe is easier to run; Apache Airflow needs more configuration.
Apache Airflow is growing faster right now (+341 stars in 30 days).
Apache Airflow details →OpenScribe details →