Apache AirflowvsLAN-Orangutan
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Apache Airflow | LAN-Orangutan | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 84/100 | 58/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #15 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 47 301 | 1 139 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +344 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 7 |
| Latest release | providers-ydb/2.6.1 · 13 Oct 2026 | v3.4.2 · 18 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Apache Airflow scores 84/100 against 58/100 for LAN-Orangutan, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, LAN-Orangutan is easier to run; Apache Airflow needs more configuration.
Apache Airflow is growing faster right now (+344 stars in 30 days).
Apache Airflow details →LAN-Orangutan details →