AnubisvsTypst
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Anubis | Typst | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 82/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 78 in Security | #1 of 2 in Publishing |
| GitHub stars | 23 783 | 56 868 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 147 | +139 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 5 |
| Latest release | v1.28.2 · 23 Oct 2026 | v0.15.1 · 17 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
Typst scores 82/100 against 80/100 for Anubis, so it is the safer default.
Anubis ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for Typst.
If you want the quickest setup, Typst is easier to run; Anubis needs more configuration.
Anubis is growing faster right now (+1 147 stars in 30 days).
Anubis details →Typst details →
Swap a project
Keep Anubis, compare it with
Keep Typst, compare it with