Anubisvssupabase
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Anubis | supabase | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 92/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 78 in Security | #1 of 40 in Database Management |
| GitHub stars | 23 779 | 114 252 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 143 | +3 543 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 8 |
| Latest release | v1.28.2 · 23 Oct 2026 | v1.26.08 · 7 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
supabase scores 92/100 against 80/100 for Anubis, so it is the safer default.
Anubis ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for supabase.
If you want the quickest setup, Anubis is easier to run; supabase needs more configuration.
supabase is growing faster right now (+3 543 stars in 30 days).
Anubis details →supabase details →
Swap a project
Keep Anubis, compare it with
Keep supabase, compare it with